Yakkstr

The US healthcare system impedes economic freedom

"Jon Cohn makes an obvious point: the current dysfunctional and stratospherically inefficient US healthcare system impedes economic freedom. It does so because people stay in jobs they may not be suited for, because they fear losing health insurance. Small businesses are hobbled by the soaring premiums, and many individuals are discouraged from going out on their own, taking risks, creating jobs, because they would lose basic healthcare and be unable to afford it, or even fail to get it at all if they have a pre-existing condition. Since the financial burden is borne primarily by the private sector, US companies also have a massive disincentive to hire more workers, because of the soaring insurance costs of adding a single employee."

source

report |
mgibbosh said almost 3 years ago ...

You are so right a young man who is a self employed handy man last year plus a week end band member grossed 43 thousand dollars last year being single he had a heavy tax burden. He also had a pre existing condition of asthma in which he got insurance but at a very high premium of 749 dollars per month with a thousand dollar deductible on hospitalization. He recently was hospitalized for an infected appendix which caused him to be hospitalized 8 days for a cost 180 thousand dollars. Surgery and antibotics couldn't be that expensive. With 59 million people without health insurance who is paying the bill.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

The free market has been hamstrung with regulations.....especially in the case of health care.....if there were true competition in this industry, prices would drop.

HSA's, Tort reform, and competition across state lines would have a huge impact on the cost of health care, and wouldn't cost tax payers a dime to try it and find out.....if it works, we all win.....if it doesn't then you could tell us conservatives to shut up once and for all on the subject and it would make way for UHC.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

What you are suggesting is that we let poor people die, right?

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

no, I'm suggesting we keep the system that we had prior to obamacare.....remove some of the regulation that is making regional monopolies possible and bring in some real competition......get rid of frivolous law suits, thereby reducing malpractice insurance rates for doctors.....and give incentives to those who exercise personal responsibility in regards to their own health care.....the poor will be taken care of, just as they were before.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

Keep the system we had? Seriously? It's terribly broken. Should insurance companies be allowed to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions? Should people go bankrupt from medical bills? Should people be afraid to leave a big company to start a business out of fear of losing insurance?

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

You didn't pay attention to a thing I posted. Liberals don't want to try things that work, they want to exacerbate problems so people will look for king like leaders to provide magical solutions that "they don't have to pay for".

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

I listened, and I asked specific questions you didn't address directly.

Should insurance companies be allowed to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions? Should people go bankrupt from medical bills? Should people be afraid to leave a big company to start a business out of fear of losing insurance?

Btw, there are many countries with better systems, and they don't look like what you are proposing.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

Should people be allowed to purchase fire insurance when their house is on fire?

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

That's why we all pay taxes and get the fire dept.

I'm glad you agree that universal single payer makes the most sense.

Or, are you advocating letting sick people without insurance die?

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

should people be able to purchase car insurance at the scene of their accident?

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

No, that's why we mandate that all drivers get insurance.

Again you are proving why we need universal coverage.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

not in the least way....They should try an unmolested free market approach...if it don't work, you can say i told you so....but we both know it would work, and more people would become independent.

grapekoolaid said almost 3 years ago ...

Social Darwinism? NOM NOM NOM

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

So if a poor person shows up at the emergency room, should the emergency room be allowed to turn them away if they can't pay?

Join our friendly Yakkstr community in 1 Easy Step
  • Meet Like Minded People
  • Share your thoughts with others who share your interests
  • No assholes to deal with, we keep them out
Join Now by writing your first comment below


Related Posts
the US Senate has thrown its weight behind gutting the core, most basic freedom upon which all others follow: habeas corpus.
"What’s wrong with indefinite detention is not a matter of the logistics of national security or military resources. What’s wrong with indefinite detention is that it is an eradication of a fundamental right upon which American democracy has stood from
2 comments
last by truthserum41 almost 2 years ago
Democrats ... The New Republicans
I have been meaning to write this post for a while, but have not had time. Unlike so many these days, I am actually employed. No thanks to our moron president or anything his administration has done. But I digress. It is unbelievalbe, but
6 comments
last by alienated about 3 years ago
Could Iran Really Close the Strait of Hormuz
There's been a real escalation of rhetoric both from the US and Iran in recent weeks. Claim and counter claim. More recently the US and western allies have taken to economic sanctions against Iran. Iran in retaliation has threatened to s
7 comments
last by superbozo about 3 years ago

Remember me

New? Sign up here.
reckoner commented 17 days ago on
Ugh....done
yeah, i feel the same a bit. One of the things I'm thinking about is making it more of a .... permanent discussion on topics. I.e. rather than talking about global warming for the 100th time, there is one organized and structured discussion of that topic read the rest
reckoner commented 17 days ago on
Shot in the back by the police
And we can admit that there is a racial bias in it read the rest
reckoner commented 17 days ago on
Shot in the back by the police
it is justice. but my question is how often this happens when there is no camera recording it. If this video didn't exist, you would insist that this "thug" tried to kill the cop, that the cop was scared for his life, and that this was justified. read the rest
reckoner commented 20 days ago on
Business fleeing red state bigotry
only old people watch news t.v. anymore read the rest
reckoner commented 20 days ago on
Business fleeing red state bigotry
I'm happy to have big company CEOs in the liberal camp. The republican party is shrinking fast! Let's be honest here, the social conservatives are hurting the party at this point. That is what you see happening. Our culture has moved read the rest
reckoner commented 21 days ago on
Minimum wage and government meddling
I beleive that in America you should not have to live in poverty if you work a full time read the rest
reckoner commented 21 days ago on
Where's the outrage?
I'm working on the new yakkstr. Stay read the rest
reckoner commented 21 days ago on
Business fleeing red state bigotry
even business is against the republican party these read the rest
reckoner commented 21 days ago on
Can we all agree that Fox has no integrity?
"You don't watch O'Riley to get the News, you watch to hear opinions" And don't you expect those opinions to have integrity? Isn't it a problem for Fox if it's got an integrity problem. Are you admitting they have no integrity on their opinion read the rest
reckoner commented 21 days ago on
Can we all agree that Fox has no integrity?
So you are saying it's OK for O'reilly to lie, and that his viewers know he's a read the rest