Yakkstr

We don't have a deficit problem

Conservative David Frum nails it.

"The United States does not have a "deficit problem." It has an immediate economic underperformance problem (which depresses revenues) and it has a chronic healthcare overpayment problem (healthcare is the most important driver—at this point you could fairly say the only driver—of U.S. federal spending). Address those two concerns, and you are well on your way to a solution."

read the rest

report |
alienated said over 2 years ago ...

Or create something like Obamacare, and you are well on your way to even bigger problems. This is funny. It reminds me of the "just buy a house" solution that Democrats came up with back in the late 70s and then it came back to crash our economy a couple of years ago. Got a deficit problem ... just declare that we really have some other kind of problem. God, I almost hope these are the end times. We are running out of people who have a brain. Maybe that is how zombies got into our national psyche. Those who can see the future (like the Mayans?) could see brainless people walking around and thought they were zombies, but they are actually just Liberals, Democrats, and Socialists.

reckoner said over 2 years ago ...

buy a house? Man, your reality distortion field is strong. Debunking your points is like shooting fish in a barrel.

alienated said over 2 years ago ...

Yes, this is just another situation that makes people like Bush look like RINOs. I did not say the intentions were not good, but any time the federal government gets overly involved in anything, that thing gets skewed and starts going bad. Just wait until we start seeing all the ramifications of Obamacare. But I suppose you will down-play that as well. Anyway, Bush was talking about simplifying the home buying process, getting rid of the fine print, making closings easier, and so on. That is not the same thing as MANDATING that home loan institutions (like banks and savings and loans) make loans to just anyone, whether they can qualify or not. You cannot give people stuff. That is the bottom line. It not only wrecks the economy, it wrecks people's self esteem and warps their sensibilities. No one respects a young adult that lives off their well-to-do parents. Why would we respect anyone living off their Uncle Sam? Why would they respect themselves? And please do not think that I think a big, bloated federal government run by a Republican is any better than a big, bloated federal government run by a Liberal / Democrat / Socialist. The operative term is "big, bloated federal government". You think that government is magically good when a Democrat is president or Democrats control congress. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Government is usually tollerable when a Republican is president because they are USUALLY trying to do away with government involvement, simplifying the process, getting rid of the fine print, and so on. Liberals / Democrats / Socialists like Obama are ALWAYS trying to make things more complicated and make each of us more dependent on their big, bloated government programs.

reckoner said over 2 years ago ...

"any time the federal government gets overly involved in anything, that thing gets skewed and starts going bad."

Weren't you one of the people who supported the idea that the federal government could spread democracy in the middle east through trillions of dollars of war? Can you be consistent?

alienated said over 2 years ago ...

I never wanted us to go to war. However, the military / national defense is one of the things the federal government is actually supposed to do, like securing our borders. It is funny that Liberals / Democrats / Socialists want the federal government to do all the things it should not do and not do all the things it should do. And let me clarify something for you ... we DO have a deficit problem. I will agree that we also have a healthcare overpayment problem, which is due to helathcare insurance, which causes medical inflation. And guess how Obama has pretended to solve the problem ... by MANDATING that everyone buy healthcare insurance. That is like getting a bad burrito from a street vendor, puking your guts out, and the vendor offers you a free burrito as compensation. Even a fifth grader can understand that ... right?

Join our friendly Yakkstr community in 1 Easy Step
  • Meet Like Minded People
  • Share your thoughts with others who share your interests
  • No assholes to deal with, we keep them out
Join Now by writing your first comment below


Related Posts
We don't need a new system
Time magazine made the "Protester" this year's "person of the year", I guess I can understand why they did that considering all of the protests that have taken place worldwide in 2011, but the protests in the USA in 2011 to me were misguided. I
20 comments Last Page
last by sean_renaud almost 3 years ago
Sixteen Afghan Civilians Killed in US Shooting Spree
(Reuters) - One or more U.S. soldiers shot dead 16 civilians, including nine children according to Afghan officials, in Afghanistan's south on Sunday in what witnesses described as a massacre.
10 comments
last by sean_renaud over 2 years ago

Remember me

New? Sign up here.
reckoner commented about 20 hours ago on
THIS....is what innocent looks like
So adults cab be shot by police because they aren't truly read the rest
reckoner commented 1 day ago on
Weather versus Climate
I can predict that if you flip a coin over and over again that you'll end up with roughly 50% head and 50% tails. I can not predict with any accuracy what a particular flip will be. Climate and weather are very similar to read the rest
reckoner commented 1 day ago on
4 Ridiculous Iraq Myths
Fact #1 and #2 It's Bush's war because his Administration pushed hard for it, and ran an enormous PR campaign to persuade people to do it. The fact that people were fooled by the lies does not mean that the Bush admin isn't the reason went to war. read the rest
reckoner commented 2 days ago on
Weather versus Climate
Yes, we should all listen to outlander and republican funded pundits over the world renowned astrophysicist Neil degrasse read the rest
reckoner commented 2 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
" Because we didn't try to soften it, we fought to win at ALL cost. If Muslims around the world started losing mosques and entire countries and hundreds of thousands of people in months we would not have terrorism or war." And you claim to value read the rest
reckoner commented 2 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
"Everyone knew the first would be easy and the latter was going to be a long haul." No, the Bush admin led everyone to believe the read the rest
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
On another occasion, Rumsfeld said, "Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that,” he read the rest
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
Rumsfeld said, "It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months," he said, speaking at the American air base at Aviano, in northern read the rest
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
the war was sold as being easy and cheap. Those are the facts. If they had said we'd still need to have troops on the ground 15 years later ... well we know they didn't say read the rest
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
preparing for the long haul
Rove’s claim is simply not true. In fact, days after the U.S. invasion, then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told a congressional panel that Iraqi oil revenues would help pay for reconstructing the country, i.e. a cost of the war. “The oil read the rest