Does anyone else find it odd that republicans are attacking Romney for being a good capitalist?

Newt and Perry are hammering him for making a fortune by buying failing companies then pulling some dirty tricks to make a tone of money, then bankrupting the company. This is, of course, the perfect example of how someone can chase profits in a way that isn't good for the country, but I'm shocked to see Newt and Perry strongly arguing that point.

read more here which talks about the documentary that Newt's super pac made and is running on south carolina.

report |
sean_renaud said almost 3 years ago ...

To be fair he did phrase things incredibly poorly and open the door for this.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

Yes, and it hasn't gone unnoticed....I think these two are done because of it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with investing money in a company that is on the rocks and doing what you can to save it....these companies would have gone under without the help and all would have been lost.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

But he didn't try to save them, and tricked people into buying there stock, which enriched him, then he bankrupted the companies, but got to keep the money.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

That is ridiculous.....bain had a good track record and saved far more than went under....it is a risk that the companies knew they were taking as well as the investors.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

Romney's private equity firm, Bain Capital, bought companies and often increased short-term earnings so those businesses could then borrow enormous amounts of money. That borrowed money was used to pay Bain dividends. Then those businesses needed to maintain that high level of earnings to pay their debts...

  • Bain in 1988 put $5 million down to buy Stage Stores, and in the mid-'90s took it public, collecting $100 million from stock offerings. Stage filed for bankruptcy in 2000.

  • Bain in 1992 bought American Pad & Paper (AMPAD), investing $5 million, and collected $100 million from dividends. The business filed for bankruptcy in 2000.

  • Bain in 1993 invested $60 million when buying GS Industries, and received $65 million from dividends. GS filed for bankruptcy in 2001.

  • Bain in 1997 invested $46 million when buying Details, and made $93 million from stock offerings. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2003.

Romney's Bain invested 22 percent of the money it raised from 1987-95 in these five businesses, making a $578 million profit.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

There wasn't one company that you listed that wasnt in business for less than 8 years after Bain......Do you think that that kind of help comes with a lifetime guarantee?

Sometimes companies fall back into the same old bad habits that got them into trouble in the 1st place.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

why are they taking unstable companies public which has high expectations? Simple, they can cash out and get rich, regardless of how the company does.

alienated said almost 3 years ago ...

Not to worry. If the Republicans offer Romney, we will get four more years of Obama.
If so, I pity your children ... and mine.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

We all know it's Romney at this point. That's why d6fer is so strongly defending him. So much for the tea party.

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

Did they take any unstable companies public that succeeded? I think they did....ever heard of Staples or Sports Authority?

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

You're making shit up, which sadly is fairly normal.

Staples was not the same situation at all. They invested in Staples in it's infancy, and it grew to be successful. It was not a large failing company like the ones I listed.

the fact that Romney made good investments in Staples isn't an excuse for other bad deads. I learned this sort of thing in kindergarten.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

Let's also be clear here, you're saying that Perry is resorting to socialist rhetoric, am I right?

d6fer said almost 3 years ago ...

I am saying that, and I think it is sad.....these guys are politicians and they play the same political games that everyone else in Washington plays....Perry and Gingrich made a bad move in taking the route they did with Romney, and I think it is going to cost them....we will see.

For me personally, it changes who I currently back, but it's not a deal breaker....anyone who opposes Barrack Obama is going to get my vote....and fortunately I believe enough Americans feel the same way to get the job done, but we shall see.

I find it funny that that is the best they can come up with to attack Romney with....I don't even know where you got that info, but if an 6 to 12 year bankruptcy after the fact is the best you can come up with, then it is a pretty weak argument.

reckoner said almost 3 years ago ...

"The carry allows general partners in investment deals to receive compensation in the form of tax-advantaged capital gains, which are taxed at 15 percent, rather than as salary, which would be taxed as ordinary income with a top rate of 35 percent. This happens because the managers are paid with a fee (up to 2 percent) plus 20 percent or more of their investor’s profits. Those profits are taxed as capital gains even though the general partners may have little or no money of their own at risk in the deal."


So not only was Romney bankrupting and laying off people, while getting filthy rich, but he was getting taxed at 15%, less than you and me, on that money, even though he wasn't investing his own money.

Don't you think this is a problem d6fer? That someone who isn't really investing their money, is getting a loophole that allows them to pay capital gains rates!

alienated said almost 3 years ago ...

Sorry guys. I cannot even pay any attention to all this because I know Joe the
plumbers types are not paying any attention to this sort of bull crap. Voters
will not elect Romney, but, if they did, it would be because of his skills not
because of his past. Face it. Clinton was getting blow jobs in the oval office
(or somewhere in the White House) and he had a past of molesting women,
but the voters elected him for his skills. Being president is nothing like being
a corporate raider, but the skills are probably not that much different. Do
you want an inexperienced wimp like Obama running the country or a
corporate raider with balls and mad skills? Never mind. I know the answer
to that one already. 

Join our friendly Yakkstr community in 1 Easy Step
  • Meet Like Minded People
  • Share your thoughts with others who share your interests
  • No assholes to deal with, we keep them out
Join Now by writing your first comment below

Related Posts
Republicans Are Playing Their Cards All Wrong
Lots of Republicans, like radio talk show host Mike Gallagher, are refraining from saying anything bad about any of the Repulbican candidates that are running for president. They want Obama out of office so bad, they want ANY Republican to beat him --
last by outlander almost 3 years ago

Remember me

New? Sign up here.
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
Abu Ghraib versus the CIA
How would Jesus view the torturers? Unlike you, I'm with Jesus on this one. And with Reagan and McCain. Supporting our troops, and remember, I am a veteran unlike you, means protecting the world from torturers. There is no greater threat to freedom than read the rest
reckoner commented 4 days ago on
It was rape and rape is torture
D6, are you really going to condone this stuff because it was a republican administration that did read the rest
reckoner commented 5 days ago on
Now that we know
Awesomely hypocritical. We now can't complain when people do this to American read the rest
reckoner commented 5 days ago on
It was rape and rape is torture
No one advocating for torture can claim to be for small government. Nothing is more "big brother" than read the rest
reckoner commented 9 days ago on
The best summary of the torture report I have seen
They tortured without knowing if the person had any information, and they tortured the wrong people, mistaken identities, over 20 times. This is a crime, and against all of the ideals of America. I agree with Reagan and McCain, you side with read the rest
reckoner commented 10 days ago on
Hero's and Victims
Anyone that believes in lower taxes no matter how liw they already are is an idiot beyond comprehension. I'll leave that issue at that. "1. He pushed for a government-guaranteed right to a job. In the years before his assassination, King re-shifted read the rest
reckoner commented 10 days ago on
Ronald Reagan on Torture
I agree with Reagan. Also, the torture didn't save anyone, it was used on over 20 people that were wrongfully held, and as the report makes clear they were torturing people when they had no idea if the victim had any useful information at all. I also read the rest
reckoner commented 11 days ago on
New Democrat Low With Torture Report
Torture is a crime and is unamerican. Reagan knew this and signed laws that require prosecution of torture. McCain says that this is clearly torture. How depraved is the conservative movement to condone such read the rest
reckoner commented 11 days ago on
Ronald Reagan on Torture
[Sounds like read the rest
reckoner commented 11 days ago on
Ronald Reagan on Torture
[This](https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/screen-shot-2014-12-09-at-2-19-30-pm.png) and [this](https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/screen-shot-2014-12-09-at-2-21-07-pm.png) sure sound like torture to read the rest